This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] tree-mustalias fix
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 15:20, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I just tested the idea of not considering (plus_expr (addr_expr) (cst))
> as gimple invariant and it solves testcase (full testing is in progress)
> and surprisingly enough it also improve Gerald's testcase:
>
But that's wrong. We will not consider that a constant, which may
prevent propagation of address constants. This is covering over the
problem.
We need to fix the gfortran problem and call fold_stmt_r on this
expression at some point.
Diego.