This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to allow arm-unknown-linux-gnu target to build in FSF mainline
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:46:11 +0000
- Subject: Re: Patch to allow arm-unknown-linux-gnu target to build in FSF mainline
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> > Unfortunately, you've checked in the ChangeLog entry but nothing else :-(
>
> Err, are you sure ? I just checked and my files appear to be
> up-to-date and the changes to config.gcc and linux-elf.h do appear to
> be in them...
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
>
Ah! it's the CVS log entry that's bogus...
cvs log config.gcc
...
gcc_ss_20001127: 1.8
gcc_ss_20001120: 1.3
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 707; selected revisions: 707
description:
----------------------------
revision 1.412
date: 2003/12/09 17:32:55; author: nickc; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
* config/m32r/m32r.h: Add support for m32r2 processor. Including
a new command line option -m32r2 to select it.
* config/m32r/m32r.c: Add support for the new processor variant.
* config/m32r/m32r.md: Likewise.
* config/m32r/t-m32r: Add m32r2 multilibs.
* doc/invoke.texi: Document the new command line switch.
And similarly for linux-elf.h
So you must have somehow committed the change on the 9th with something
else.
The reason I was confused was
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-12/msg00420.html
Which showed only the ChangeLog entry go in.
R.