This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: law at redhat dot com, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:55:25 -0800
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping
References: <xypbrqpgkk1.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com> <200312042057.hB4KvXLU024899@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <20031204210500.GA16928@redhat.com> <20031204213102.GA31081@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:31:02PM +0100, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> > 	dest = test ? &&L1 : &&L2
> 
> but this should not have a void type, right?

True, but it does show that COND_EXPR with labels in the
arms means two different things at different times.

Which is wrong.

I'm much more receptive to the CF_EXPR idea than this.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping
  - From: law
- Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]