This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Avoid nondeterminism in tree-ssanames


On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 13:39, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > It makes 11% performance difference on Gerald's testcase on my setup,
> > just FYI.
> 
> If I read this correctly...
> 
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Unless it's a huge win, I would *really* want to go back to the previous
> > scheme of having unique SSA numbers across the whole compilation unit.
> 
> ...you might be able to convince Diego. :-)
> 
> 11% on PR8361 is quite impressive an improvement!

I'd want to know where that 11% came from, it sounds like one (or more)
of the optimizations are doing something pretty inefficient and ought to
be looked at first. Just reducing the number of SSA_NAME ought not have
that significant an effect if everyone is being reasonably intelligent
about how they do things.

Its definately worth investigating.

Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]