This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Patch ping

Hello,

> > yes, this is from where the idea is taken; you may note that I did not
> > like it very much, on the other hand, saving 50 bytes on every fifth
> > statement of a program seemed good enough argument to me.
> 
> Do you have some data, for example for PR8361?  
> 
> If you can show improvement for real-world code, that'll certainly help
> your cause. ;-)

the problem is that I don't know exactly what my cause is :-). I dislike
the current solution as it is a waste of memory.  I dislike the solution
I have implemented in this patch, since it is quite dirty.  I like the
CF_EXPR change I have proposed a while ago, but I seem to be the only
one :-)

Zdenek
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]