This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: updated for unwind-libunwind.c

>>>>> On 20 Nov 2003 15:04:49 -0800, Jim Wilson <> said:

  Jim> On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 22:10, David Mosberger wrote:
  >> * config/t-libunwind: Mention unwind-c.c.  (SHLIB_LC): Overwrite
  >> the default-value from t-slibgcc-elf-ver and mention -lunwind so
  >> that the resulting has the necessary DT_NEEDED entry
  >> for libunwind.  * unwind-libunwind.c (_Unwind_GetCFA): Implement.
  >> (_Unwind_GetBSP) [UNW_TARGET_IA64]: New function.

  Jim> Thanks.  I checked this in.


  Jim> I rewrote the ChangeLog entry a bit to match our conventions.
  Jim> In particular, the DT_NEEDED comment should be in the
  Jim> config/t-libunwind file not in the ChangeLog entry.  There was
  Jim> also a typo in your address.

OK, I'll try to do better next time.

  Jim> I tested this with a debian testing (sarge) bootstrap and
  Jim> testsuite run with --enable-libunwind-exceptions.  The
  Jim> libstdc++ testsuite gets 1403 more passes with this patch.

That wasn't expected, but it's certainly welcome news!

  Jim> I see that all of those 1403 testcases fail if we don't use
  Jim> libunwind.  So there appears to be something seriously broken
  Jim> with gcc's builtin unwinder. I haven't tried looking into this
  Jim> yet.

I looked at the builtin unwinder for libc recently:

I don't think the C++ breakages are quite the same though, since the
libc problems were largely triggered by asynchronous unwinding in
response to a signal.  However, I'm wondering whether the
.copy_state/.label_state may be getting in the way.  I know the
builtin unwinder doesn't handle those quite right and newer GCC's emit
those directives much more frequently.  When I fixed libunwind to
handle copy_state/label_state, I decided against updating the builtin
unwinder, since I was worried that the changes could be destabilizing.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]