This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Make tail-call work on SSA form

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:30:08 -0800
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Make tail-call work on SSA form
References: <20031116223212.GC3330@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <1069173838.18647.6.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20031118171036.GR11681@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <1069175720.18647.23.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20031118172735.GH16923@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:27:35PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> -   /* FIXME: Apparently we always need TREE_ADDRESSABLE for aggregate
> -      types.  Is this a backend quirk or do we actually need these?  */
> -   if (!AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (var)))
> -     TREE_ADDRESSABLE (var) = 0;

Is this *really* a workaround for the call bug, or is it something else?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Make tail-call work on SSA form
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- [tree-ssa] Make tail-call work on SSA form
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [tree-ssa] Make tail-call work on SSA form
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] Make tail-call work on SSA form
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [tree-ssa] Make tail-call work on SSA form
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] Make tail-call work on SSA form
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]