This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
Cc: "Bernardo Innocenti" <bernie at develer dot com>,"Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,"GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:29:28 +0100
Subject: Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
References: <3FB68E4E.6060308@develer.com> <200311160921.04345.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <00c401c3ac3d$91e878e0$c0ba2997@bagio>

> Sure, because the patch was never backported to the 3.3 branch. It was
> only applied to mainline.

Ah! ok, thanks for the clarification. Is it scheduled to be backported (once 
fixed) to the 3.3 branch?

> FWIW, the problem with my patch was exactly this, it caused no regressions
> in the C++ testsuite but still broke libgcj.

Hum... that's not what I saw:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-11/msg00641.html

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

References:
- [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]