This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree0ssa] Dead const/pure function removal take II

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>,Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:28:00 +0100
Subject: Re: [tree0ssa] Dead const/pure function removal take II
References: <20031111173141.GS1729@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <1068575992.10124.36.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20031111184206.GB1729@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <1068576280.10123.38.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20031111203611.GD1729@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20031111220154.GC9461@redhat.com>

> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:36:11PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > HOw it can happen to have context NULL?
> 
> Mostly likely is someone calling build (LABEL_DECL...)
> instead of create_artificial_label.

Doesn't seem to be the case (i've added check that all labels are having
valid DECL_CONTEXT), will continue tomorrow.

Honza
> 
> 
> r~

References:
- [tree0ssa] Dead const/pure function removal take II
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [tree0ssa] Dead const/pure function removal take II
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree0ssa] Dead const/pure function removal take II
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [tree0ssa] Dead const/pure function removal take II
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree0ssa] Dead const/pure function removal take II
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [tree0ssa] Dead const/pure function removal take II
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]