This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Unreviewed patch (^3), PR debug/5271


Hmm.  Thinking about this, it seems to me that the problem is not so much
with CALL_EXPRs as with arguments to inlined functions.  If we change
initialize_inlined_parameters to wrap the initializations in a WFL, I would
expect that to do the trick--i.e. around the INIT_EXPR for C/C++ and the
MODIFY_EXPR for Java.

Thoughts?  Sorry to come up with this so late in the game.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]