This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:15:33 -0500
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <1068129237.29404.12.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20031106161106.GA4144@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 11:11, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> > New regressions in 20031106/gcc.sum.gz:
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030821-1.c scan-tree-dump-times dont_remove \(\) 1
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030824-1.c scan-tree-dump-times y \+ x 1
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030825-1.c scan-tree-dump-times bla 1
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031015-1.c scan-tree-dump-times VUSE 1
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031021-1.c scan-tree-dump-times a.i 1
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c scan-tree-dump-times 42 1
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-1.c scan-tree-dump-times 63 1
>
> these seem all to be caused by the fact that I have actually killed the
> TDI_optimized dump. This patch should fix it.
>
Have you confirmed that the patch fixes these problems? If so, OK.
What about the Fortran regressions?
Diego.