This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Address some fallout from "fractional modes"

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:35:06 -0800
Subject: Re: RFC: Address some fallout from "fractional modes"
References: <87r80n7io0.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <20031105185152.GC28707@redhat.com> <87oevqa8rl.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:57:18AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Using either "unsigned int" or "signed int" here causes "comparison of
> signed and unsigned" warnings (in different places).  "unsigned short"
> doesn't.

Huh.  Ok.

I suspect we want to fix things so that unsigned int works,
but clearly that's outside the scope of this patch.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Address some fallout from "fractional modes"
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- RFC: Address some fallout from "fractional modes"
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFC: Address some fallout from "fractional modes"
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: RFC: Address some fallout from "fractional modes"
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]