This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [cs] Robustify in the presence of PCH n snarf-n-barf


Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com> writes:

> The question is, do people think that migrating to _slightly_ stronger
> typing, when it is 100% appropriate and easy is worth-while, and if
> so, then how do we make this and PCH co-exist?

I'm in favor of migrating to _much_ stronger typing of GCC's internal
data structures, and I bet you it will make PCH easier to implement.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]