This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [cs] Robustify in the presence of PCH n snarf-n-barf
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- Cc: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:39:39 -0800
- Subject: Re: [cs] Robustify in the presence of PCH n snarf-n-barf
- References: <24FF3168-0B37-11D8-B2B9-003065A77310@apple.com>
Mike Stump <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The question is, do people think that migrating to _slightly_ stronger
> typing, when it is 100% appropriate and easy is worth-while, and if
> so, then how do we make this and PCH co-exist?
I'm in favor of migrating to _much_ stronger typing of GCC's internal
data structures, and I bet you it will make PCH easier to implement.