Re: PATCH: enable Ada test suite

["Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>]

"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk> writes:

> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Mike Stump wrote:
>
>> gcc should swicth to 0 unexpected failure on one platform for releases 
>> as a release requirement, as an existence proof that it can be done.  
>> It doesn't entail too much work, as we can always mark tests that do 
>> fail as expected, if we can't get them fixed.
>
> How about on all primary release platforms?  If we actually have testers
> for them sending testresults in the run-up to the release, it shouldn't be
> hard to do.  (Of course we should check that a test failure isn't a
> regression, or the RM should postpone the corresponding PR to the next
> release, before marking a failure as expected.)

I think this is a fine idea, and something we should do for 3.4.

zw