This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix for fortran PR/12701 (second try).

From: Paul Brook <paul at nowt dot org>
To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:40:06 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix for fortran PR/12701 (second try).
References: <3F997A14.2030409@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <200310262234.58855.paul@nowt.org> <3F9EDA8C.9030308@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>

On Tuesday 28 October 2003 9:07 pm, Toon Moene wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> > On Friday 24 October 2003 8:14 pm, Toon Moene wrote:
> >>The attached patch fixes fortran PR/12701 with no regressions.
> >
> > I suspect you're forgetting to free the memory you allocate to hole the
> > filename (not a major issue). Other than that it's ok.
>
> This is the better patch I told you about.  Bootstrapped [tree-ssa] C
> and f95; make -k check gfortran only - no regressions.
>
> OK to apply ?

Ok.

Paul

References:
- [PATCH, gfortran] Fix for fortran PR/12701.
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix for fortran PR/12701.
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix for fortran PR/12701 (second try).
  - From: Toon Moene

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]