This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering.

On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 17:31, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hello,
> > > there is SWITCH_EXPR removal.  Then BIND_EXPR removal -- the first patch
> > > for it ( +
> > > perhaps one updated version, IIRC) is also laying idle for about month and half now,
> > > plus about two additional patches are requiered for this.  Then
> > 
> > I will take a look at SWITCH removal now, if you have that laying around
> > somewhere. (well, 'now' probably means monday now that its friday night
> > :-) Don't worry about removing the insert code required for switches, I
> > can delete those once they arent needed any more. (A form of therapy
> > perhaps :-)
> > 
> > IIRC BIND_EXPR had some complexities Im not familiar with (debugging
> > symbols perhaps?), I think it was rth you worked this through with
> > wasn't it?  perhaps in the interest of expediance he can take a look at
> > that one, although I will as well if he doesnt get to it. There are 3
> > patches if I read your note correctly?
> > 
> > Is BIND_EXPR dependant in any way on SWITCH? ie, do we need to get
> > SWITCH and COND in before a BIND_EXPR patch has any hope of applying?
> no, bind_exprs are completely independent issue.  I will try to create
> the SWITCH_EXPR lowering patch tomorrow (although the fact that
> COND_EXPR lowering is not in is complicating this; the two patches
> will neccesarily conflict with each other).

Hold off for a day or two then, we'll get COND_EXPR in shortly, then you
can produce the SWITCH patch..


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]