This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering.


Hello,

> > there is SWITCH_EXPR removal.  Then BIND_EXPR removal -- the first patch
> > for it (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg01962.html +
> > perhaps one updated version, IIRC) is also laying idle for about month and half now,
> > plus about two additional patches are requiered for this.  Then
> 
> I will take a look at SWITCH removal now, if you have that laying around
> somewhere. (well, 'now' probably means monday now that its friday night
> :-) Don't worry about removing the insert code required for switches, I
> can delete those once they arent needed any more. (A form of therapy
> perhaps :-)
> 
> IIRC BIND_EXPR had some complexities Im not familiar with (debugging
> symbols perhaps?), I think it was rth you worked this through with
> wasn't it?  perhaps in the interest of expediance he can take a look at
> that one, although I will as well if he doesnt get to it. There are 3
> patches if I read your note correctly?
> 
> Is BIND_EXPR dependant in any way on SWITCH? ie, do we need to get
> SWITCH and COND in before a BIND_EXPR patch has any hope of applying?

no, bind_exprs are completely independent issue.  I will try to create
the SWITCH_EXPR lowering patch tomorrow (although the fact that
COND_EXPR lowering is not in is complicating this; the two patches
will neccesarily conflict with each other).

Zdenek


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]