This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering.
- From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 24 Oct 2003 13:48:56 -0400
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering.
- References: <200310241746.h9OHk61u008165@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 13:46, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> In message <20031024174329.GA17642@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, Zdenek Dvorak wri
> >> You can't always use the CFG for everything.
> >I don't say for everything. But following the gotos is the reason for
> >having cfg.
> Err, there are cases where we may want to follow gotos without a CFG. Say
> in that wonderful little place when we've translated out of ssa form,
> but have not translated into RTL.
but then the bb_for_stmt wouldn't matter if there is no CFG :-). What
else is in the stmt annnotation that might.