This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering.


Hello,

>  >> The only other thing that I think Diego agreed with (yes? no?) is that
>  >> we probably ought to set the BB for the 2 goto's on the arms of the
>  >> COND_EXPR. Yeah, they aren't real stmt's, but there is no reason someone
>  >> couldn't look at them as real stmts.. ie, someone doing path following
>  >> may want to process the 2 arms exactly like they process a GOTO, so we
>  >> ought to make them behave like a GOTO stmt for consistancy, so we ought
>  >> to set their BB.
>  >
>  >I don't want to do it.  Every change of the statement would than have to
>  >take care of setting it, which would be a source of unnecessary errors. 
> Err, why again aren't the arms real statements?  I thought we had decided
> to go ahead and leave them as real statements with their associated basic
> blocks.

no, they are not separate statements.  And unless someone gives me some
convincing arguments why they should be, I am not going to change it.
Period.  You had two months to discuss these things, and you could
easily check on tree-ssa-cfg-branch what I have in mind, so don't come with
changes that would require reworking all I had done to me now.

Zdenek


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]