Re: mips64 bootstrap fix

[David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>]

cgd@broadcom.com wrote:

> At Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:06:14 +0000 (UTC), "David Daney" wrote:
>  
>
> > Would you mind trying to run testsuite/gcc.dg/cleanup-9 on this build?
> > I was never able to test on a 64 bit platform.
> >    
>
> I was able to do so with clean-ish sources as of 2003-10-23 00:00 UTC
> (**without** Guido's patch).  (I kind of wonder what's different about
> his system that he needs the patch, than mine...)
>  
It may depend on the version of glibc used.

I was depending on unwind-dw2.c to include these definitions via 
tsystem.h.  After looking at it again, it looks like <sys/types.h> is 
already be included so adding it to linux.h *should* be unnecessary.

> anyway, for mips64-linux (native, not bootstrap):
>
> -mabi=32:
>        PASS: gcc.dg/cleanup-9.c (test for excess errors)
>        FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-9.c execution test
>
> -mabi=n32:
>        PASS: gcc.dg/cleanup-9.c (test for excess errors)
>        FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-9.c execution test
>
> -mabi=64:
>        PASS: gcc.dg/cleanup-9.c (test for excess errors)
>        FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-9.c execution test
>
>
> FYI, from 8/26 to 10/15 00:00 UTC those tests were UNSUPPORTED,
> then they took up the behaviour described above as of 10/19.
>
> No special error information is output from the test, they just fail.
>
> I don't really have time to dig in and debug, but if there's some
> specific information i can provide you, I'll be glad to give it a
> try...
>
>
> Looking through my test logs for mipsisa64-elf, looks like they're
> still UNSUPPORTED there.  8-)
>
>
>
> chris
I was only able to test it on a mipsisa32el-linux target.  I will take 
another look at it, but have no way of testing/debugging on anything 
other than the hardware I have.

David Daney.