This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Another bug in local static variables

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 06:52:44 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Another bug in local static variables
References: <20031018172520.GH6212@kam.mff.cuni.cz><wvlfzhq8br0.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com><20031018215300.GL15904@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 23:53:00 +0200, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:

> On the other hand if we duplicate decls inside the function body, we
> will end up with single variable referred by multiple decls everywhere
> (imagine two inline versions of function in one body)

Good point.

Jason

References:
- [tree-ssa] Another bug in local static variables
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [tree-ssa] Another bug in local static variables
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [tree-ssa] Another bug in local static variables
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]