This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [windows][rft] regparm vs stack probe fix
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:13:10AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:27:05AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Richard, do you see any problem with using ebx for argument passing and just
>> bypassing this problem entirely?
>ebx is call saved.
After hours of staring at prologue code, I thought ebx was used without
saving. Now that I look at it tonight, I can see that isn't the case.
And, in fact... I knew that. I had to save it in some of the cygwin