This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [windows][rft] regparm vs stack probe fix

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Danny Smith <dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Cc: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:01:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [windows][rft] regparm vs stack probe fix
References: <20031020070041.GD3658@redhat.com> <001101c396eb$6d88f900$5f6d65da@DANNY> <20031020132705.GC17120@redhat.com> <000c01c39744$1b0ef040$886d65da@DANNY>

On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:55:20PM +0100, Danny Smith wrote:
> FWIW. my earlier patch (use fastcall convention rather than regparm
> when optimizing local functions via cgraph) can be applied on top of
> this.

Agreed.


r~

References:
- [windows][rft] regparm vs stack probe fix
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [windows][rft] regparm vs stack probe fix
  - From: Danny Smith
- Re: [windows][rft] regparm vs stack probe fix
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: [windows][rft] regparm vs stack probe fix
  - From: Danny Smith

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]