Re: [PATCH] Yet another tree dumper

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

| > Anyway, my take is that the new dumper should not sit or #ifdefed: it
| > should take parameters into account.  That concern was already
| > expressed and it was not addressed.
| 
| I'm not understanding what you're referring to.

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-10/msg00819.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-10/msg01272.html

| The main concern
| I saw was that it is redundant to have two dumpers, so I'm suggesting
| we should make it easy (i.e. the default) to try the new dumper, so
| we can evaluate it action.

I'm suggesting that, even for evaluation purpose, the new tree dumper
uses parameters to decide which "output format" is desired.  That even
makes for an easier evaluation.

-- Gaby