This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Yet another tree dumper
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:39:14 -0700, Devang Patel <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Also, have you tried the pretty-printer on the tree-ssa branch?
> I looked at pretty-printer. It is a totally different beast. It does
> not reveal internals of tree nodes. It is not a alternative for
> debug_tree() or dmp_tree().
...which is why both it and debug_tree exist.
> In the past, people expressed interest to see debug_tree()
> alternative. Here it is. Try it in your local source tree and
> see if it is good enough. If it has problems, let me know.
I'm not going to accept a whole new dumper that serves the same purpose as
debug_tree; that's way too much code duplication. If you don't like how
debug_tree works currently, change it so that it works the way you want.
Or argue that your new dumper is strictly better than debug_tree and should
replace it. Either way, there can be only one.