This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ patch] PR C++/12574


On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 09:20, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 01:46, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > the testcase shows that there is yet another way to reffer to functiona
> > > ddress using baselink expression.  I am not quite sure I deal with all
> > > cases correctly as perhaps I should do something about TEMPLATE_DECL and
> > > OVERLOAD too.  Mark?
> > 
> > I think that if this patch is necessary something else is wrong.
> > 
> > First, the language-specific tree code is BASELINK, not ADDR_EXPR.  So,
> 
> OK, can BASELINK appear in other context than ADDR_EXPR too, for
> instance to represent direct call?

Don't know -- but cxx_callgraph_expr should be parallel to
cxx_expand_expr.  That's the canonical source of front-end specific tree
nodes that can be seen by the middle end.

-- 
Mark Mitchell <mitchell@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]