This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ patch] PR C++/12574

> On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 01:46, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the testcase shows that there is yet another way to reffer to functiona
> > ddress using baselink expression.  I am not quite sure I deal with all
> > cases correctly as perhaps I should do something about TEMPLATE_DECL and
> > OVERLOAD too.  Mark?
> I think that if this patch is necessary something else is wrong.
> First, the language-specific tree code is BASELINK, not ADDR_EXPR.  So,

OK, can BASELINK appear in other context than ADDR_EXPR too, for
instance to represent direct call?

> cxx_callgraph_expr should only have code for BASELINK.  Second, if you
> look at cxx_expand_expr, the only way a BASELINK is used is to pull out
> BASELINK_FUNCTIONS.  If that's going to work, then BASELINK_FUNCTIONS
> must be a FUNCTION_DECL at that point.  So, just do:
>   my_friendly_assert (TREE_CODE (fn) == FUNCTION_DECL, ...);
>   cgraph_mark_needed_node (cgraph_node (fn));

OK, that would work for my testcase..

> -- 
> Mark Mitchell <>
> CodeSourcery, LLC

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]