This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix minor bug in alpha.c:expand_block_move

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: rth at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 03 20:25:16 EDT
Subject: Re: Fix minor bug in alpha.c:expand_block_move

    Please, please, PLEASE, describe the bug!  ALWAYS!

I thought I did ...

    How is it possible for the register referenced by an
    addressof to not be a register?  This makes no sense.

If it had already been forced into memory.  For example, in the case of
a nested procedure.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]