This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Ping rtlopt merge patches
- From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andrew Pinski <apinski at apple dot com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:26:06 +0200
- Subject: Re: Ping rtlopt merge patches
- References: <7F7467A6-FAEA-11D7-BA85-0003939F15BE@physics.uc.edu>
> All of these are from February (before Phase 2) and received no
> comments except
> for one but the problem was fixed (was a doc problem).
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00467.html
> rtlopt merge part 6 - tiny regrename improvement
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg02336.html
> rtlopt-branch merge - variable tracking pass - part 2
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg02280.html
> rtlopt-branch merge - variable tracking pass - part 1
> (already pinged today:
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-10/msg00722.html> but good to
> ping again.)
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00501.html
> rtlopt merge part 8 - webizer pass
> (should really help SPEC on PPC) (had the doc problem).
The documentation bits are at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00540.html
I would really like to see this one in as it deals with performance
regression we introduced by replacing old loop unroller.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01537.html
> rtlopt merge part 11 - trace selection in sched_ebb
>
> From January:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg01952.html
> rtlopt merge part 3 - CFG update for EBB scheduling
This patch went in in another incarnation of it.
Abother the other patches of mine (all except for variable tracking). I
think they still should work for mainline, but I can send updated
versions if needed.
Thanks,
Honza
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski