This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] [web] my major changes for 3.4
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:57:20 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [web] my major changes for 3.4
- References: <243BF6AA-FA07-11D7-8061-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Index: changes.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.4/changes.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.54
> diff -u -p -r1.54 changes.html
> --- changes.html 9 Oct 2003 02:58:25 -0000 1.54
> +++ changes.html 9 Oct 2003 03:16:01 -0000
> @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@
> a correct implementation of <code>#import</code> and
> <code>#pragma once</code>.
> These two directives have therefore been un-deprecated.</li>
> + <li>A new option has been added to warn about the use of
> initializing
> + variables with themselves. See <a
> + href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-
> Options.html#Warning%20Options">
> + -Winit-self</a> for more information.</li>
> </ul>
May I suggset to rephrase this as follows?
A a new command-line option <a href="..."><code>-Winit-self</code></a>
has been added to...
This part is fine with this change, thanks!
> + <li>Darwin's generation of PIC code has been changed to allow for
> + front-ends that emit RTL interwoven of different function (i.e the
> + Ada front-end). </li>
According to codingconventions.html we should use "front end", and
I believe it should read "i.e.", or better, "like the Ada front end"?
Still, I'm afraid something is missing from this sentence?
Gerald
--
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/