This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix newlib includes. Random mips exp fixes.
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Ben Elliston <bje at wasabisystems dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, bug-dejagnu at gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:54:52 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix newlib includes. Random mips exp fixes.
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:27:59AM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:26, Ben Elliston wrote:
> > Eric Christopher <email@example.com> writes:
> > > The mips changes are necessary for cross linking g++.
> > For these changes, you were beaten to it:
> > 2003-06-13 Phil Edwards <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > * baseboards/mips64-sim.exp, baseboards/mips-sim.exp,
> > baseboards/mips-sim-idt32.exp, baseboards/mips-sim-idt64.exp: Use
> > only -T[linker] instead of -Wl,-T[linker].
> > I will commit your other patch now.
> Heh. That's what I get for giving that diff to so many people ;)
Indeed, I'm not entirely certain why my name is on that. :-) I remember
coming up with one change on my own, and then asking Eric, and finding out
he had a patch for multiple variations, and I've been using his ever since.
More to the point, I still don't understand why '-Wl,' isn't behaving as
it ought, so don't ask me to fix anything...
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
- Brian W. Kernighan