This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
C++ compiler failures (was Re: Avoid explicit use of machine modes(9/n) fp comparison)
- From: Raja R Harinath <harinath at cs dot umn dot edu>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 22:13:55 -0500
- Subject: C++ compiler failures (was Re: Avoid explicit use of machine modes(9/n) fp comparison)
- Cancel-lock: sha1:YZXzY5HaAC+sTxqwo47bam9hU3s=
- Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Minnesota
- References: <200310060056.h960uaHE023622@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <877k3j0w2r.fsf@codesourcery.com>
Hi,
"Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
> "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> writes:
>
>>> > powerpc64-linux (cross from powerpc-linux), ia64-hpux11.22 and
>>> > hppa2.0w-hpux11.11. The hpux targets get lots and lots of test
>>> > suite failures, but I do not think they are caused by this patch.
>>
>> I've been away for a few days but there didn't used to be lots and
>> lots of failures ;(
>
> Yeah, but I bootstrapped the exact same tree with and without the
> patch to rule out its being my fault. I see the C++ compiler crashing
> under dejagnu and not when run manually, and I blame PCH, but that's a
> kneejerk not a reasoned theory.
A few weeks ago, I tracked it down to the dejagnu scripts
setting/resetting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. You may have a different problem.
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu