This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 20:59:13 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
- References: <2818635A-EF7E-11D7-9657-000A95AF1FAE@dberlin.org>
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> After discussing it on IRC (the words "This is trivial" were uttered,
> the gauntlet laid down, and the challenge taken up), i'm starting to
> work on tracking patches +followup discussion through bugzilla, so that
> they don't get lost, and so we can associate bugs as being blocked on
> the patches that fix them (and whatnot).
I think it would be preferrable to have such a patch tracker (that
tracks every single patch) separate from the bug-tracking system.
Also, I'm afraid we'll change from one extreme (no patch tracking)
to the other (over-zealous patch tracking).
A middle-ground I'd prefer is having patches explicitly submitted
by contributors, perhaps after they haven't been reviewed upon first
submission to the list. I think this will be much more manageable
for us in the long or even mid term.
> Note that people with mailers that don't set references/in-reply-to
> properly, of course, won't get pasted into the bug as a followup.
> This of course, only affects a few well-known people using EVIL
> MAILERS(TM), and this feature should be considered part of the ongoing
> worldwide conspiracy to get them to move to a reasonable mailer.
Good luck! :-)
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) email@example.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/