Re: [cs] pipe infrastructure support

[Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>]

Mike Stump wrote:-

> On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 10:38  PM, Neil Booth wrote:
> >So has it been agreed that, for example, a compile server is definitely
> >a good thing that must go in GCC?
> >
> >I'm not persuaded, for example.
> 
> I guess you don't want a c++ compiler that is 2.2-2.5x faster do you 
> then?  Some people actually care about compile speed.  Hopefully the 
> people that review this won't actually stand in the way of progress.  
> If you have a better way, put it in now, otherwise...

Well, you've done zippo to persuade me.  I care about a faster compiler
as much as you claim to, but I care even more about a correct and
maintainable compiler.

As you're aware, the burden of acceptance of a substantial change to
GCC lies on the proposer, not me.

Neil.