This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 21 Sep 2003 21:00:55 +0200
Subject: Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309211006200.31501-100000@www.eyesopen.com><m31xuani7y.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><Pine.LNX.4.56.0309211453200.25513@dberlin.org>

Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:

| >
| > | Or put another way, If someone with RTH's history of regression fixing
| > | patches, GCC design and code improvements can't come up with a failing
| > | test case, isn't that an incredibly strong argument that the patch is
| > | sound?
| >
| > No. Not necessarily.  RTH didn't say it can't come up with a testcase
| 				       ^^
| 
| I knew it was a bot!

I'm sorry :-(

I hope RTH didn't take offense.

-- Gaby

References:
- Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]