This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA/RFT] libffi reorg

From: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Cc: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:43:47 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFT] libffi reorg
References: <1058195670.3331.25.camel@escape> <003401c37e9b$de5fb230$e314623e@philo>

Paolo Bonzini wrote:

Either the patch can be applied as is, with maintainers trying to fix the
failures (if any), or people can send me the reports for failed platforms
(or patches to make them build :-) and I can collect them and repost the
patch.  Of course I'd prefer the former...

Will try to.

Making all in include make[2]: *** No rule to make target `ffitarget.h', needed by `all-am'. Stop. make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2

What autofriends did you use?

Almost applies to todays cvs, one reject in darwin.S. (include)

What makes me confused is the occurence of two fficonfig.h on in toplevel and another one in include. Is this meant in this direction? The two files have different contents here.

powerpc-apple-darwin6.3

Thanks,
Andreas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA/RFT] libffi reorg
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [RFA/RFT] libffi reorg (take 2)
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- [RFA/RFT] libffi reorg
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]