This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:25:58 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:15, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
>
>> size of x now depends on non-existent variable z.1, which causes a crash
>> when an attempt to copy it before passing to foo is made.
>>
> But this also means that we are still generating VLAs. Shouldn't your
> original change removed that?
No, the decl still has VLA type.
Jason
- References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2