This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [committed] Fix bug in unsupported target list in config.gcc

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:09:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [committed] Fix bug in unsupported target list in config.gcc
References: <20030829181630.GA5308@twcny.rr.com> <200308291835.h7TIZ9P02650@greed.delorie.com> <3F4F9D48.6070900@twcny.rr.com>

>   I gave my reason for not doing so (uncertainly about whether there
> might be a sysvxxx out there).

The same uncertainty works for sysvxxx that *are* supported
(i.e. aliases for sysv4) also, so I think that's a moot point.  But,
I'm only worried about compatibility.  Do we use this construct
elsewhere?

References:
- Re: [committed] Fix bug in unsupported target list in config.gcc
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Re: [committed] Fix bug in unsupported target list in config.gcc
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [committed] Fix bug in unsupported target list in config.gcc
  - From: Nathanael Nerode

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]