This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2

From: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:17:50 +0200
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
References: <20030828175405.GA8012@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200308281908.h7SJ8Ic23839@tin.geop.uc.edu>

Hello,

> > > The stack save should also go inside the BIND_EXPR, but before the
> > > TRY_FINALLY_EXPR.
> > > 
> > > Also, you need to make sure that you don't add these again if the BIND_EXPR
> > > gets gimplified again.
> > 
> > done. Just retesting it, ok if it passes?
> 
> Now this went in would some mind testing PR 11267 to see if it is fixed now?

I will try, but I don't think so. There is a similar test in testsuite
that fails with the same message -- that did not get fixed.  The problem
seems to be somewhere earlier in gimplification.

Zdenek

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]