This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 13:54, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > The stack save should also go inside the BIND_EXPR, but before the
> > TRY_FINALLY_EXPR.
> >
> > Also, you need to make sure that you don't add these again if the BIND_EXPR
> > gets gimplified again.
>
> done. Just retesting it, ok if it passes?
>
Zdenek,
If you're going to get rid of VLAs, perhaps a subsequent patch could get
rid of the code that deals with VLAs in find_hidden_use_vars_r.
Diego.
- References:
- [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, second attempt
- [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2
- Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2