This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH] Fix __builtin_expect
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:46:19 +0200
- Subject: [PATCH] Fix __builtin_expect
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Hi!
The following testcase (as well as linux-2.6.0-test4 kernel) is miscompiled
on IA-32 on all of 3.2/3.3 branch and trunk.
The problem is that although expand_builtin_expect_jump checks
unsafe_for_reeval, it doesn't consider stack adjustements,
so when it expands the jump, sees num_jumps == 0 (in this exact testcase
there are no conditional jumps to either of if_{true,false}_label, as
there are branches to a different label emitted at the end and unconditional
jump to if_false_label) and throws away the whole emitted sequence,
anything emitted by do_pending_stack_adjust is thrown away.
The following patch fixes this.
Ok for 3.3/HEAD?
2003-08-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* builtins.c (expand_builtin_expect_jump): Save pending_stack_adjust
and restore it if returning NULL.
* gcc.dg/20030826-2.c: New test.
--- gcc/builtins.c.jj 2003-08-26 10:53:02.000000000 -0400
+++ gcc/builtins.c 2003-08-26 11:55:07.000000000 -0400
@@ -4330,6 +4330,7 @@ expand_builtin_expect_jump (tree exp, rt
&& (integer_zerop (arg1) || integer_onep (arg1)))
{
int num_jumps = 0;
+ int save_pending_stack_adjust = pending_stack_adjust;
rtx insn;
/* If we fail to locate an appropriate conditional jump, we'll
@@ -4421,7 +4422,10 @@ expand_builtin_expect_jump (tree exp, rt
/* If no jumps were modified, fail and do __builtin_expect the normal
way. */
if (num_jumps == 0)
- ret = NULL_RTX;
+ {
+ ret = NULL_RTX;
+ pending_stack_adjust = save_pending_stack_adjust;
+ }
}
return ret;
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20030826-2.c.jj 2003-08-26 12:01:36.000000000 -0400
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20030826-2.c 2003-08-26 11:09:49.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i386" { target i?86-*-* } } */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+extern void exit (int);
+
+struct S
+{
+ int *a;
+ unsigned char *b, c;
+};
+
+int u, v, w;
+
+void
+foo (unsigned short x)
+{
+ u += x;
+}
+
+int
+bar (struct S **x, int *y)
+{
+ w += *y;
+ *y = w + 25;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int
+baz (struct S **x)
+{
+ struct S *y = *x;
+ unsigned char *a = y->b;
+
+ foo (*a);
+
+ if (__builtin_expect (y->c != 0 || y->a == &v, 0))
+ return 1;
+
+ if (__builtin_expect (*a == 1, 0))
+ {
+ int a, b = bar (x, &a);
+
+ if (a)
+ return b;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ struct S a, *b = &a;
+ unsigned char c;
+
+ __builtin_memset (b, 0, sizeof (a));
+ a.a = &v;
+ a.b = &c;
+ if (baz (&b) != 1)
+ abort ();
+ exit (0);
+}
Jakub