This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GCSE PATCH]: make complexity cut off less binary
Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
>> I'm afraid it's still not right; the sentences are still broken in
>> half. Consider a language with gender markers on the verb: "BYPASS
>> disabled" and "GCSE disabled" might require different forms of
>> the verb "disabled".
> this one?
>
> nathan
>
> --
> Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
> The voices in my head said this was stupid too
> nathan@codesourcery.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
>
> 2003-08-25 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
>
> * gcse.c: #include intl.h.
> (PASSES_DEF, PASS, PASS_STRING): New.
> (enum pass): New.
> * gcse.c (is_too_expensive): New function.
> (gcse_main, delete_null_pointer_checks, bypass_jumps): Use it.
This is fine *if* you now regenerate gcc.pot and verify that the
complete messages to be translated all show up there.
zw