This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Re: Your addition of BT_SSIZE

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Paul Brook <paul at nowt dot org>
Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:47:07 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Your addition of BT_SSIZE
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308182227130.22816-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <1061310369.3380.81.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <200308191913.56420.paul@nowt.org>

On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 14:13, Paul Brook wrote:

> When I get chance I'll remove builtins.def from gfortran, and do like java 
> and g77 do. In the meantime I reccommend putting something like
>   signed_size_type_node = size_type_node;
> at the end of gfc_init_types (trans-types.c).
> 
OK.  If that works and it's only temporary, then it's fine with me. 
When you do fix it, could you also undo Roger's patch?  It's posted
earlier in this thread.

Roger, I don't think your patch is necessary for mainline anymore.  But
I don't really understand all the issues, so I'll let you decide.

Thanks.  Diego.

References:
- [PATCH] Re: Your addition of BT_SSIZE
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Your addition of BT_SSIZE
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Your addition of BT_SSIZE
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]