This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Simplify handling of TARGET_4300_MUL_FIX

> 
> Well... there's only two places to look ;), the insn pattern itself or
> the default definition.  And if the insn pattern doesn't have an explicit
> length, you know you have to look at the default definition.
> 

Fair enough :)

> IMO, there's not really any difference between doing this for idiv and
> doing it for loads and stores.
> 

Enh. At least with loads and stores it's more expected. But I don't have
a huge opinion either way so I'll go with what's easier for the guy
doing the work ;)

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]