This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ patch] one more missed mark_used

Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:

| > > We don't, but I think we also don't care.  If a template argument is
| > > relevant to the generated code, it will appear in an expression.  If a VLA
| > > type is used in a decl, we catch it that way because we also walk the size
| > > of a decl from the DECL_STMT.
| > 
| > OK.  If you're comfortable with that, it's OK by me.
| Actually situation is even more complicated.  We have to deal with Java
| tinfos and eh_spec_block.  Is the updated patch OK?
| 
| Thu Aug 14 12:19:25 CEST 2003  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>

Nit:  Use the canonical form for date, e.g. 2003-08-14.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]