This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++] Un-precious the CC-related variables

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rsandifo at redhat dot com,libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:01:32 +0200
Subject: Re: [libstdc++] Un-precious the CC-related variables
References: <20030811055643.GA21878@disaster.jaj.com>

Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:

> Folks are finding that we have to remove the "precious variable" protection
> from CC, like I did with CXX et al.  This should help with the multilibs
> problems until multilibs get moved to the top level, although I don't have
> x86_64 or irix systems to verify that.

Thanks, this seems to fix it for me on x86_64,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [libstdc++] Un-precious the CC-related variables
  - From: Richard Sandiford

References:
- [libstdc++] Un-precious the CC-related variables (was Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC)
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]