Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc

[Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>]

On Aug  4, 2003, Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva wrote:-
>> Ok, bootstrapped on i686-pc-linux-gnu, regression tested, no
>> regressions.  I'm checking this patch in.  It includes a testcase that
>> will let us know in case we unintentionally change behavior.
>> 
>> I think with this change all cb_line_change implementations have
>> parsing_args unused.  Should we remove it?

> Please.  I was going to ask you to do it, but didn't want to
> make you do too much 8-)

Thanks :-)

I'm a bit concerned about removing it, since you said you might not
want to retain the current behavior in the future, and then you might
need this flag to change the separate and integrated preprocessors to
match what the separate preprocessor did.  Should I go ahead with the
removal anyway?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer