This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Thomas Walker <Thomas dot Walker at morganstanley dot com>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>,Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,mbp at sourcefrog dot net, distcc at lists dot samba dot org
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:04:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- References: <orsmpjo3b6.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orof07nvhr.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20030711054556.GS29961@daikokuya.co.uk> <ord6ght41a.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20030711220756.GT29961@daikokuya.co.uk> <orvfu5b6d4.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orptkanlu2.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orzniqgb2h.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20030803173802.GA28693@daikokuya.co.uk> <orsmohzd7e.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Alexandre Oliva wrote:-
> On Aug 3, 2003, Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > it would need to be -fpwd.
>
> Can you please explain to me why you think it makes more sense for the
> flag to be -fpwd than -Pwd?
It supports the no- form, and doesn't require SPEC changes. Being
an -f switch doesn't mean it's not for CPP - just look at c-opts.c
for example.
Neil.