This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>,Thomas Walker <Thomas dot Walker at morganstanley dot com>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>,Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,mbp at sourcefrog dot net, distcc at lists dot samba dot org
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 19:20:40 +0100
- Subject: Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- References: <ED06E029-B327-11D7-BDE9-003065A77310@apple.com> <or4r1tvene.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orn0eqg7zx.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20030803174250.GB28693@daikokuya.co.uk> <or65lefw60.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Alexandre Oliva wrote:-
> Then we'll have to fix the integrated preprocessor to do whatever you
> consider to be correct. This patch only arranges for the separate
> preprocessor to match what the integrated one does as far as the
> compiler computes the line of a declaration.
Please post an example of input and how it looks on output before
and after.
> > Does this break people preprocessing Fortran?
>
> I've no idea. How do I tell?
I know that changes in this area have before. Maybe check through
past PRs and mails to the mailing lists?
Neil.