This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Thomas Walker <Thomas dot Walker at morganstanley dot com>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>,Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,mbp at sourcefrog dot net, distcc at lists dot samba dot org
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 18:38:02 +0100
- Subject: Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- References: <oradbrpwc0.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20030706152710.GH23832@daikokuya.co.uk> <orsmpjo3b6.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orof07nvhr.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20030711054556.GS29961@daikokuya.co.uk> <ord6ght41a.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20030711220756.GT29961@daikokuya.co.uk> <orvfu5b6d4.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orptkanlu2.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orzniqgb2h.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Alexandre Oliva wrote:-
> On Jul 16, 2003, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 14, 2003, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> I don't see anything clear about it. -f to me is an option to the
> >> compiler. This one isn't. It's an option to the preprocessor. I'm
> >> currently thinking -Pwd would be the best choice, since -P has to do
> >> with printing line markers, but If you care so much about -fpwd, I'll
> >> go with that.
>
> > Ping?
>
> No response, so I assume -Pwd is a reasonable option. Here's a
> patch, bootstrapped on i686-pc-linux-gnu. Ok to install?
There has been no agreement on this patch. If there were, it
would need to be -fpwd.
Neil.